Long Beach, CA
File #: 10-1108    Version: 1 Name: CD-8,4,5,9 - Mayor's veto message
Type: Agenda Item Status: Received and Filed
File created: 9/24/2010 In control: City Council Special Meeting
On agenda: 9/28/2010 Final action: 9/28/2010
Title: Recommendation to consider and discuss the Mayor's Fiscal Year 2011 Veto Message, dated September 19, 2010, pursuant to Section 1704 of the Long Beach City Charter.
Sponsors: COUNCILWOMAN RAE GABELICH, EIGHTH DISTRICT, COUNCILMEMBER PATRICK O'DONNELL, FOURTH DISTRICT, COUNCILWOMAN GERRIE SCHIPSKE, FIFTH DISTRICT, COUNCILMEMBER STEVEN NEAL, NINTH DISTRICT
Indexes: Budget
Attachments: 1. 092810-NB-2 memo re Mayor veto message.pdf
TITLE
Recommendation to consider and discuss the Mayor's Fiscal Year 2011 Veto Message, dated September 19, 2010, pursuant to Section 1704 of the Long Beach City Charter.

DISCUSSION
On Tuesday, September 14, the City Council adopted a balanced budget that included $18,5 million in reductions to the General Fund.

The cuts already approved by the City Council will result in 64 fewer police officer positions, 18 fewer firefighter positions and potential rolling brownouts of fire engine staffing throughout the city, a reduction of hours at all libraries to five days a week, reduced staffing at after-school parks programs and the reduction or elimination of recreational programming at several sites, and the elimination of a pothole truck, meaning 12,000 fewer potholes will be filled.

On, Sunday, September 19, the Mayor issued a veto of $2.7 million in General Fund expenditures and a veto of $60.432 million in the Harbor Department's capital outlay budget.

The City Council deliberated for nearly two months over the budget that was presented by the Mayor and City Manager to the Council, and the Council approved a budget that made cuts in the amount recommended in the Mayor's and City Manager's budget.

At no time during the budget discussions by the full Councilor the Budget Oversight Committee did the Mayor express any opposition to the Council approving appropriations in the amount of his proposed budget. Moreover, city management has indicated to councilmembers that from the time the balanced budget was approved by the City Council, until the Mayor issued his veto five days later, no additional financial figures have been issued indicating that the FY 2011 budget needed to be reduced further.

The Council and the public need a complete review of why the additional cuts are being made and how the cuts will impact services and jobs.

For the discussion at the September 28 Council meeting, we request the Mayor and/or the City Manager provide the City Council with ...

Click here for full text