Long Beach, CA
File #: 08-0673    Version: 1 Name: CD-8&7 - Proposition 1B bond proceeds
Type: Agenda Item Status: Withdrawn
File created: 6/30/2008 In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/22/2008 Final action: 7/2/2008
Title: Recommendation to request City Manager to revise the allocation of Proposition 1B funds to provide a more equitable distribution of Proposition 1B funds throughout the City.
Sponsors: COUNCILWOMAN RAE GABELICH, EIGHTH DISTRICT, COUNCILMEMBER TONIA REYES URANGA, SEVENTH DISTRICT
Attachments: 1. 070808-R-17sr.pdf
Related files: 09-0118

TITLE

Recommendation to request City Manager to revise the allocation of Proposition 1B funds to provide a more equitable distribution of Proposition 1B funds throughout the City.

 

DISCUSSION

In November 2006, the voters of California approved Proposition 1 B, which authorized the sale of more than $1 billion in bonds for infrastructure improvements, with a portion of the bond proceeds allocated directly to cities for infrastructure repairs.

 

Long Beach's share of this allocation will amount to $15,425,294, with the first amount released this year to the City totaling $7,947,949.

 

The proposition was approved by more than 61 percent statewide. In Long Beach, the ballot measure received 66 percent support, with a majority of voters in each council district approving the measure.

 

Even though voters from throughout the City approved Proposition 1 B, the allocation of money for street repairs is not distributed equally in each district. Districts in which the Redevelopment Agency approved funding for additional street repair work are receiving a smaller allocation of Proposition 1 B funds.

 

When the Council approved an initial list of projects in December 2007, it was indicated that the list allowed for future allocation modifications if deemed appropriate. The Redevelopment funds are intended to enhance the quality of life in blighted areas. Those areas should not be penalized with fewer infrastructure dollars that were approved by voters throughout the City.

 

TIMING CONSIDERATIONS

None.

 

FISCAL IMPACT

None.

 

SUGGESTED ACTION

Approve recommendation.

 

Respectfully Submitted,

 

 

Councilmember Rae Gabelich, Eighth District

 

Councilmember Tonia Reyes Uranga, Seventh District