Long Beach, CA
File #: 06-0479    Version: 1 Name: CC - Agreement with Nista, Hancock, and Knapp
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 5/18/2006 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/23/2006 Final action: 5/23/2006
Title: Recommendation to authorize City Manager to execute an agreement with Nista, Hancock, and Knapp for voter education and outreach services associated with the June 6, 2006, General Municipal Election in an amount not to exceed $119,270.
Sponsors: City Clerk
Attachments: 1. C-8sr
Related files: 29705_000
TITLE
Recommendation to authorize City Manager to execute an agreement with Nista, Hancock, and Knapp for voter education and outreach services associated with the June 6, 2006, General Municipal Election in an amount not to exceed $119,270.

DISCUSSION
After consideration of five vendor requests for proposals, Nista, Hancock and Knapp was retained by the City Clerk to provide assistance with voter education and outreach services related to the 2VoteTuesday campaign.

When initially retained via a City purchase order, the City Clerk Department estimated that the cost of services would not exceed $100,000. Services provided included: creation and design of slogans, banners, press releases, video production mailing materials, internet page design and other related tasks. As of this date, all services have been provided and delivered on time.

However, given increased voter education and outreach demand, the City Clerk Department estimates that the existing purchase order authority of $100,000 will be exceeded. With receipt of vendor cost estimates for additional services needed to meet increased demand, the City Clerk Department will require an increase in the Purchase Order not to exceed the amount of $1 19,270. This amount includes a 10% contingency.

With regard to the June 6,2006 election, the City Clerk Department has requested that Nista, Hancock and Knapp provide additional assistance in the areas: [l] outreach to approximately 10,000 voters whose Sample Ballots were returned as undeliverable; 121 outreach to opproximately 10,000 voters who requested County Absentee Ballots, but who had not requested a City absentee ballot; [3] outreach to approximately 10,000 voters in cases where County polling locations did not match locations listed on City Sample Ballots; [4] production of a public service announcement video that educates voters regarding the distinct differences between the County’s InkAVote ballot and the City’s Opto-Mark ballot and the need to cast...

Click here for full text