Long Beach, CA
File #: 14-1054    Version: 1 Name: CM - Bluff Erosion Project D3
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 12/1/2014 In control: City Council
On agenda: 12/16/2014 Final action: 12/16/2014
Title: Recommendation to receive report and provide direction to staff on the options addressing biotechnical and various other alternatives for the Ocean Boulevard (Bluff) Erosion and Enhancement Phase 2 Project. (District 3)
Sponsors: City Manager
Attachments: 1. 121614-R-19sr&att.pdf, 2. 121614-R-19 PowerPoint presentation.pdf, 3. 121614-R-19 Corresp. Geever.pdf, 4. 121614-R-19 Corresp. Waksul.pdf
Related files: 13-0565, 14-0485
TITLE
Recommendation to receive report and provide direction to staff on the options addressing biotechnical and various other alternatives for the Ocean Boulevard (Bluff) Erosion and Enhancement Phase 2 Project. (District 3)

DISCUSSION
Background

On April 22, 2014, the City Council asked staff to consider delaying the continued implementation of the Ocean Boulevard (Bluff) Erosion and Enhancement Phase 2 Project (Project). The City Council adopted the Plans and Specifications (No. R-6959) for the Project on July 9, 2013, and awarded a contract to Drill Tech Drilling & Shoring, Inc. for the work, which included the use of stained, sculpted and landscaped shotcrete to provide bluff erosion control and secure the bluff in the event of a major seismic event.

On April 29, 2014, the City Council held a special meeting and took action to delay the Project for 45 days and directed staff to: (1) conduct an engineering analysis (peer review) of the Bluff; (2) consider other alternatives to Bluff stabilization, other than shotcrete; (3) advise the Council on community improvements to the Bluff that do not involve shotcrete; and (4) report the results of staff's analysis and stabilization alternatives to the Council and online to the public. In response to the City Council's direction, City staff provided the attached May 13, 2014 memorandum (Attachment A).

On July 1, 2014, the City Council considered a geotechnical peer review report (Attachment B) and directed the City Manager to: 1) move forward expeditiously with the top park portion of the Bluff (including the new required irrigation system) and with any of the other infrastructure improvements, such as railing and sidewalk work; 2) evaluate biotechnical alternatives for the remaining portions of the slope that have not received the final shotcrete treatment, as discussed in Section 3.0 of the Peer Review Report and report back to the Council; 3) conduct limited additional shotcrete in transitional areas, comp...

Click here for full text