Long Beach, CA
File #: 11-0446    Version: 1 Name: CD-2,1 - agressive & passive solicitation
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 5/2/2011 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/10/2011 Final action: 5/10/2011
Title: Recommendation to respectfully request City Attorney to work with the City Prosecutor and City Manager to draft an ordinance protecting pedestrians and businesses from aggressive and passive solicitation.
Sponsors: VICE MAYOR SUJA LOWENTHAL, SECOND DISTRICT, COUNCILMEMBER ROBERT GARCIA, FIRST DISTRICT, COUNCILMEMBER GARY DELONG, THIRD DISTRICT
Indexes: Ordinance request
Attachments: 1. 051011-R-9sr&att.pdf, 2. 051011-R-9 Revised sr.pdf, 3. 051011-R-9-Handouts various correspondence.pdf, 4. 051011-R-9-Handouts S Lowenthal.pdf
Related files: 11-0946
TITLE
Recommendation to respectfully request City Attorney to work with the City Prosecutor and City Manager to draft an ordinance protecting pedestrians and businesses from aggressive and passive solicitation.

DISCUSSION
For the last year, District 1 & 2 council offices have been working with the Downtown Long Beach Associates’ Public Safety Task Force to research solicitation ordinances from other cities in California, Oregon and Washington and to develop potential language for an ordinance in Long Beach. The task force also met with the City Prosecutor and City Attorney’s office to discuss potential ordinance language and legal concerns. It is made up of residents and business owners in the downtown (voting members), as well as representatives from our offices, Long Beach Police Department, LA County Sheriff’s Department and the Office of the Mayor (Advisors).

In public and private meetings, residents, business owners, property owners and business improvement districts such as DLBA have consistently expressed concerns about solicitation or what is commonly called “panhandling” of pedestrians and drivers. At a town hall hosted by the DLBA’s Downtown Retail Visioning Committee, solicitation was among the most mentioned concern of residents. Female residents in particular complain of being intimidated and harassed on a regular basis by individuals. So much so that they express a reluctance to walk along certain business corridors or frequent particular businesses at different times of the day or night. Clearly, this activity is affecting the quality of life of our residents and the livelihood of our businesses.

While there are protections for solicitation under the First Amendment, cities struggling with similar concerns are seeking to better define “aggressive solicitation” and determine locations where even “passive solicitation” is prohibited. The purpose of the requested action is to protect pedestrians when they are most vulnerable to harassme...

Click here for full text