Long Beach, CA
File #: 22-1421    Version: 1 Name: CD3 - Reevaluation of Parklets
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 11/28/2022 In control: City Council
On agenda: 12/6/2022 Final action: 12/6/2022
Title: Recommendation to direct City Manager to work with City Attorney and the Director of Public Works to reevaluate the city’s ordinances related to permanent parklet approvals, including the requirement for community group input, and come back to the City Council at the next regular meeting with a proposed draft ordinance language change.
Sponsors: COUNCILWOMAN SUZIE A. PRICE, THIRD DISTRICT
Attachments: 1. 120622-R-36sr, 2. 120622-R-36 Corresp. Cotton, 3. 120622-R-36 Corresp. Quigley
TITLE
Recommendation to direct City Manager to work with City Attorney and the Director of Public Works to reevaluate the city’s ordinances related to permanent parklet approvals, including the requirement for community group input, and come back to the City Council at the next regular meeting with a proposed draft ordinance language change.

DISCUSSION
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Long Beach has implemented creative approaches to protect the health of residents while making it possible for restaurants throughout the city to remain open and successful. One of the most visible city policies that Long Beach developed was a temporary parklet program that allowed restaurants to operate outdoor dining in parklets located in parking spaces on public streets.
As the temporary parklet program has served its purpose of assisting restaurants to retain some of their income while indoor dining was prohibited or limited, they are now back to pre-pandemic capacities. The temporary parklet program is intended to sunset in January of 2023.
The existing language of the permanent parklet ordinance places an undue burden on community groups and needs reevaluation. s. Currently, Long Beach Municipal Code (“LBMC”) Chapter 14.15 et seq. requires businesses applying for a permanent parklet to obtain approval from community groups to pursue their application. In effect, this language gives final authority to decide the future of a parklet to community groups rather than adding community input as one of the many factors to be assessed when staff considers the appropriateness of a parklet as outlined in LBMC Chapter 14.15
The language contained in LBMC Chapter 14.15 does not align with the original intentions of the City Council. When Council discussed the role of community groups in the application process, it was to ensure there was an opportunity for them to provide meaningful feedback. The City Council did not intended to allow for an individual community organiza...

Click here for full text