Long Beach, CA
File #: 13-018SA    Version: 1 Name: 120313-SA-Contract with LPA, Inc., for architectural services
Type: SA-Contract Status: Approved
File created: 11/21/2013 In control: As the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Long Beach
On agenda: 12/3/2013 Final action: 12/3/2013
Title: Recommendation to authorize City Manager to execute a contract with LPA, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $697,162 for architectural services related to the design of a new North Library to be paid for by excess bond proceeds of the former Redevelopment Agency. (District 9)
Indexes: Contracts
Attachments: 1. 120313.sa.item2.pdf
Related files: 10-135R, 12-019SA, 12-029OB, SA 0008_000
TITLE
Recommendation to authorize City Manager to execute a contract with LPA, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $697,162 for architectural services related to the design of a new North Library to be paid for by excess bond proceeds of the former Redevelopment Agency.
(District 9)

DISCUSSION
Chapter 9 of AB 1484 (“Post Compliance Provisions”) provides that following issuance of a Finding of Completion to a successor agency, that successor agency may expend “excess bond proceeds.” Pursuant to Section 34191.4(c), these are bond proceeds in excess of those needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations, which are spent consistent with the original bond covenants. When an expenditure is made pursuant to Section 34191.4(c)(2), it constitutes the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations, rather than an enforceable obligation, to be paid from the excess proceeds. On April 23, 2013, the Successor Agency received its Finding of Completion, and is now eligible to spend its excess bond proceeds.

In May 2010, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Long Beach (former Agency) issued Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds and Build American Bonds (2010 bonds). The proceeds from the 2010 bonds must be spent on public improvements benefiting the former North Long Beach Redevelopment Project. Within the seven months prior to December 31, 2010, the former Agency entered into contracts to expend a portion but not all of the bond proceeds on qualifying projects. The contracts approved and executed prior to December 31, 2010, qualified as enforceable obligations and were approved on the Successor Agency’s Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule (EOPS) and subsequent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS).

As noted above, the expenditure of excess bond proceeds is considered an excess bond proceeds obligation. Given the special status of these funds, as sanctioned obligations not subject to the EOPS, and the Successor Agency’s responsibilities to disch...

Click here for full text