TITLE
Recommendation to approve the draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule 16-17, for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (Citywide)
DISCUSSION
Section 34177(o)(1) of the California Health and Safety Code, as adopted by AB1x 26 (the “Dissolution Act”) and most recently amended by Senate Bill (SB) 107, requires the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Long Beach (Successor Agency) to prepare a draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) covering the period from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017, and for each period from July 1 to June 30 thereafter. Each ROPS must list dates, amounts, and payment sources of the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Long Beach’s (Agency) enforceable obligations. The attached draft ROPS represents the anticipated enforceable obligations for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 (Exhibit A).
The ROPS is based on the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule, a list of the total outstanding debts and obligations of the Agency, which was certified by the California Department of Finance (DOF) on March 30, 2012.
The ROPS must identify the source of payment for each obligation from among the following:
• The Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund - RPTTF (maintained by the County)
• Bond Proceeds
• Reserve Balances
• Administrative Cost Allowance
• Other revenue sources including rents and interest earnings
This ROPS requires the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency of the City of Long Beach approval as well, and will be agendized for its review on January 27, 2016. In accordance with SB 107, each annual ROPS must be submitted to the DOF for review and certification no later than February 1, 2016, and each February 1 thereafter. Because the deadline for the ROPS is one month earlier than it has been in the past, all of the financial data to complete the Fund Balance, Prior Period Adjustment and Summary worksheets will not be finalized prior to submittal to the Successor Agency and minor modifications may occur between the version before the Successor Agency and the Oversight Board. Changes to the ROPS Detail worksheet (spending authorization) are not anticipated.
Upon certification, the DOF will transmit a copy of the ROPS to the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller (Auditor-Controller). Prior to July 1, 2016, the Auditor-Controller will distribute property tax revenue to the Successor Agency from the RPTTF for approved payments listed on the ROPS. This distribution will be from property taxes the Auditor-Controller received from former Long Beach redevelopment project areas from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2016. Another distribution is anticipated on January 1, 2017, from property taxes collected from May 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.
Additionally, pursuant to Section 34171(b)(3) of the Dissolution Act, the Successor Agency is allowed an administrative allowance, subject to Oversight Board approval. The allowance is capped at 3 percent of the actual property tax allocated to the Successor Agency, less the administrative allowance and any loan payments made to the City during the prior fiscal year.
The administrative cost allowance includes items such as salaries, including citywide and departmental overhead costs for Successor Agency and other City staff carrying out the necessary actions to wind down the Successor Agency’s affairs; preparation of the ROPS and Administrative Budgets; and operational costs associated with these actions. Exhibit B outlines the proposed Administrative Budget for the Successor Agency for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.
This matter was reviewed by Deputy City Attorney Richard F. Anthony on December 22, 2015 and by Budget Management Officer Victoria Bell on December 29, 2015.
TIMING CONSIDERATIONS
Successor Agency action is requested on January 26, 2016, to allow for the transmittal of the ROPS to the Oversight Board for approval on January 27, 2016, and to the DOF prior to the February 1, 2016 deadline for submission.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed Administrative Budget from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, is approximately $893,131, or 3 percent of the $29,771,043 in RPTTF funds, less the administrative allowance remitted to the Successor Agency during the prior fiscal year.
The proposed Administrative Budget conforms to the administrative cost allowance prescribed by SB107. However, due to the changing nature of the DOF decisions, it is difficult to predict the administrative costs that will actually be allowed and reimbursed. In the event that all of the administrative costs on the attached budget are not reimbursed, other Successor Agency revenues are budgeted to help address the shortfall. The adoption of the recommended action allows the Successor Agency to meet its obligations to continue dissolution of the former Redevelopment Agency.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve recommendation.
Respectfully Submitted,
AMY J. BODEK, AICP
DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
APPROVED:
PATRICK H. WEST
CITY MANAGER