Long Beach, CA
File #: 05-3364    Version: 1 Name: Long Beach Municipal Code to allow for permitted dog breeding. (Citywide)
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 10/26/2005 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/1/2005 Final action: 11/1/2005
Title: Recommendation to request City Attorney to prepare an amendment to Section 6.16.080 and Section 6.16.190 of the Long Beach Municipal Code to allow for permitted dog breeding. (Citywide)
Sponsors: Health and Human Services
Indexes: Ordinance request
Attachments: 1. C-17 sr
TITLE
Recommendation to request City Attorney to prepare an amendment to Section 6.16.080 and Section 6.16.190 of the Long Beach Municipal Code to allow for permitted dog breeding.  (Citywide)
 
DISCUSSION
The Department of Health and Human Services Animal Control Division is responsible for the enforcement of Title 6 of the Long Beach Municipal Code (L.B.M.C.), which includes Sections 6.16.080 and 6.16.190 that regulate animal breeding. As currently written, these Municipal Code sections prohibit any breeding of animals within the City of Long Beach.
 
Over the past three years, City of Long Beach residents who wish to breed their dogs, as well as national organizations that promote the continuation of dog breeds through responsible breeding , have approached the City, requesting a reconsideration of the City's total ban on dog breeding. As a result of the inquiries, Department of Health and Human Services Animal Control staff reviewed the history of Title 6 of the L.B.M.C.
 
In reviewing Title 6 of the L.B.M.C., staff found that Section 6.16.190 was re-titled from "Breeding Kennels a Nuisance" to "Dog Breeding Prohibited" during the recodification process of 1982. The recodification process was intended to only reorganize and renumber the existing Long Beach Municipal Code, and not modify or affect in any manner the scope, meaning or intent of the Code. In re-titling Section 6.16.190, however, the meaning and interpretation of the section was inadvertently changed to prohibit any breeding of dogs by private individuals, which was not the intent of the L.B.M.C., as originally enacted.
 
Before recommending an amendment to the City's animal breeding ordinance, Animal Control Division staff conducted a telephone survey of nine major cities and counties throughout the United States to determine what, if any, restrictions were placed on animal breeding in their jurisdictions. While no locale had a specific law banning the breeding of domestic animals, most agencies within these jurisdictions attempted to control the irresponsible breeding of animals with permits and fees. The Department of Health and Human Services is very aware of the pet overpopulation problem in our society and recognizes that thousands of animals are euthanized each year in animal shelters across the country. However, with proper restrictions that allow for limited, controlled breeding of dogs by permit, it is unlikely that the amendments to L.B.M.C. Sections 6.16.080 and 6.16.190 will add to the dog overpopulation problem in Long Beach. As responsible dog owners are permitted to breed their animals under stringent requirements, it is hoped that  fewer unwanted dogs will be dropped off at the shelter.
 
Staff is recommending that the City Council request the City Attorney to amend L.B.M.C. Sections 6.1 6.080 and 6.1 6.190 to better define when dog breeding will be permitted in the City. Specific recommendations include:
 
A. Allowing dog breeding under specified conditions, including requiring an application
B. Requiring a permit from the City to ensure dog breeding is occurring in a humane
C. Limiting breeding to one litter per permitted household per calendar year;
D. Allowing for breeding site inspections by Animal Control staff; and
E. Prohibiting dog breeding of the following: owners of known vicious animals; dog
   breeds disproportionately responsible for dog bites in the city; animal abusers; or
   others who violate the dog breeding ordinances.
 
This letter was reviewed by Deputy City Attorney Richard F. Anthony on October 24,2005 and Budget Management Officer David Wodynski on October 21,2005.
 
TIMING CONSIDERATIONS
Council action on this matter is not time critical.
 
FISCAL IMPACT
It is estimated that one hundred ( I 00) dog breeding permits will be issued annually at a fee of $140 per permit, producing annual revenues of $14,000 to recoverthe costs of providing the inspection and permitting activities.
 
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve recommendation.
 
Respectfully Submitted,
RONALD R. ARIAS
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES